From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 05:30:45 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D28916A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 05:30:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (f170.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.170]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67F9E43D55 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 05:30:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j385UdiO023796; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 07:30:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Warner Losh From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 07 Apr 2005 17:14:15 MDT." <20050407.171415.74666363.imp@bsdimp.com> Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 07:30:39 +0200 Message-ID: <23795.1112938239@critter.freebsd.dk> Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GEOM architecture and the (lack of) need for foot-shooting X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 05:30:45 -0000 In message <20050407.171415.74666363.imp@bsdimp.com>, Warner Losh writes: >The tools we have suck in many ways. No one disputes that. Rather >than flame people, I'm going to work within the GEOM framework to see >if the glaring deficiencies in the kernel/userland APIs can be >corrected. If I come up with anything I'll let people know. Much appreciated Warner. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.