From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 2 20:25:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55D931065673 for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2009 20:25:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-current@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6CC28FC1A for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2009 20:25:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-current@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LpTTh-0006bU-60 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2009 20:25:33 +0000 Received: from 93-138-88-151.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([93.138.88.151]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 02 Apr 2009 20:25:32 +0000 Received: from ivoras by 93-138-88-151.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 02 Apr 2009 20:25:32 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 22:25:09 +0200 Lines: 47 Message-ID: References: <367b2c980903311133v37833cabla4934f8b1a9b5e15@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig0AF00B832FA1D7C0D6D217CF" X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 93-138-88-151.adsl.net.t-com.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: <367b2c980903311133v37833cabla4934f8b1a9b5e15@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Sender: news Subject: Re: strange UFS labels behaviour X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 20:25:35 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig0AF00B832FA1D7C0D6D217CF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Olivier SMEDTS wrote: > Hi, >=20 > Since UFS labels were introduced, I've got strange behaviour when > fsck-ing or mounting my UFS partitions. Here is the console output at > boot : > Is this expected ? I didn't read your message in detail but if are you asking if the "label =2E.. removed" are valid when the device is opened from an "alternative" entry point (e.g. ad0s1e instead of ufsid/4867d45fd3972203) then yes, this is by design. The label is read from the file system metadata and anything that opens that file system for its own use can change this metadata - so the labels are removed. (note that this is nothing special as far as GEOM_LABEL is concerned - this is present in all types and forms of labels). If you're complaining about the verbosity of the whole process then I think you can set the kern.geom.label.debug sysctl to -1 to avoid these messages. The "modern" way would be to use the labels as device nodes for mounting instead of raw devices - in this case they would "stay" when opened. --------------enig0AF00B832FA1D7C0D6D217CF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAknVHyUACgkQldnAQVacBchuxACgg2GuKaEpeb+2Lrr10lKWbgQU eoMAn2n+UWZ/H1UPvf01zuXlRWraGd// =J3jT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig0AF00B832FA1D7C0D6D217CF--