Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 10:57:18 -0500 From: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> To: "Mikhail Teterin" <mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: some more patches for firefox Message-ID: <op.svpnxsa89aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> In-Reply-To: <200508181020.42566@aldan> References: <200508151109.j7FB97hl004446@corbulon.video-collage.com> <200508151823.49554.Mikhail.Teterin@murex.com> <op.svmy4nti9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <200508181020.42566@aldan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:20:42 -0500, Mikhail Teterin <mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com> wrote: > On Wednesday 17 August 2005 01:06 am, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > = Hope, I didn't miss anything so far. You can see my commit over at MC > [1] > = and let me know if I did something wrong or else. Thanks for your work > and > = summitted the patches! > > Well, all that's left now, is do the same for other mozilla ports -- > mozilla itself, thunderbird, what else?.. :-) I don't mind to give thunderbird a shot, but don't know if I will touch other gecko-based ports. > They all seem to bundle dbm, jpeg, fdlibm, nspr, nss... > > BTW, once things, I'd love to extricate into a port of its own, is the > xp* parts of their tree -- xpcom, xpfe, xpinstall. But I can not find > these available standalone anywhere. Yeah, kind of bummer that they don't provide a nice library of gecko too. Cheers, Mezz > There is plenty of documentation about xpcom, for example, but nothing > seems to point to a standalone release. There are plenty of warnings in > it on a 64-bit machine, which worries me. Yet it also has plenty of > self-tests, which we never run... > > -mi -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.svpnxsa89aq2h7>