From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Jul 29 11:33:54 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from poboxer.pobox.com (ferg5200-1-29.cpinternet.com [208.149.16.29])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE94D15106
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 29 Jul 1999 11:33:49 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from alk@poboxer.pobox.com)
Received: (from alk@localhost)
	by poboxer.pobox.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id NAA00498;
	Thu, 29 Jul 1999 13:33:28 -0500 (CDT)
	(envelope-from alk)
From: Anthony Kimball <alk@pobox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 13:33:28 -0500 (CDT)
X-Face: \h9Jg:Cuivl4S*UP-)gO.6O=T]]@ncM*tn4zG);)lk#4|lqEx=*talx?.<li^!8ecK]}3L-
	6`ZQW3}kxy*5]B<KA"&iBl58"/$W-0PP`B7c%'XczR)8T0VN47L`rQlu8qBIX4TJ|v'D%:k7GO%v4A
	Os>Gk,dMQU2)ptPC17cpBzm(l'M|H8BUF1&]dDCxZ.c~Wy6-j,^V1E(NtX$FpkkdnJixsJHE95JlhO
	5\M3jh'YiO7KPCn0~W`Ro44_TB@&JuuqRqgPL'0/{):7rU-%.*@/>q?1&Ed
Reply-To: alk@pobox.com
To: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: noatime with softupdates -- superfluous?
X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 "Emerald" XEmacs  Lucid
Message-ID: <14240.40500.685249.77954@avalon.east>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


I used to observe notable speedup for long recursive directory
operations by specifying noatime in mounts.  Does this really matter
any more with softupdates?



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message