From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 11 01:30:22 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3105337B407 for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 01:30:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from danux.slashlog.org (oh-northwoods1b-126.clvhoh.adelphia.net [24.50.205.126]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23B4443F3F for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 01:30:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from daniel@slashlog.org) Received: from danux.slashlog.org (oh-northwoods1b-126.clvhoh.adelphia.net [24.50.205.126]) by danux.slashlog.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 295CC5780C for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 04:21:50 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 04:21:49 -0400 From: Daniel C Bastos To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20030811042149.1175eca5.daniel@slashlog.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.8) X-Face: b9]T)Hu/K$-ow%H*9%; DdY8u#whYsf2&wyr?QbOaDP[ad3wT6y#BsXp[xF@V-'J!y9b$$a* /,j'qP#wKzo7Jk%cJ,G-[IwB0MaA")Hn5"7*hlBNLNx0g]tX@TB?8G/=Zs$"; v/kPDb,-2JKo5A5J? HNLlTy9q<(#~\I@\*B-XsVF`\G!E*`^RK],\t_S Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: swap_pager: out of swap space X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 08:30:23 -0000 Aug 11 03:56:34 danux /kernel: swap_pager: out of swap space Aug 11 04:02:34 danux /kernel: swap_pager_getswapspace: failed Aug 11 04:02:34 danux /kernel: pid 278 (XFree86), uid 0, was killed: out of swap space i was actually looking at the screen and then everything stopped (mouse etc). i could not switch to console, but a ctrl+alt+del rebooted fine. one thing that could be taking a lot of memory was a program called "xwatch" (/usr/ports/sysutils/xwatch) reading a log file (with a lot of activity from a software i'm developing) and xwatch might not be limiting its buffer... ? i don't know, wouldnt the kernel kill xwatch instead of xfree86? i appreciate any info on this. thanks. FreeBSD danux.slashlog.org 4.8-STABLE FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE #0: Tue Aug 5 03:48:15 EDT 2003 daniel@danux.slashlog.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DANUX i386 -- daniel