From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 12 21:18:09 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7C0816A4CE for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 21:18:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailout01.sul.t-online.com (mailout01.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E87943D39 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 21:18:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from M.Santhoff@t-online.de) Received: from fwd00.aul.t-online.de by mailout01.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1D04eW-00006L-01; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 22:18:08 +0100 Received: from localhost.das.netz (r3CJBGZGYeYRqF03hqM8QnhFBb+kanLZqSHxbyEfF9IqbZ6oXNNZ41@[217.251.154.223]) by fwd00.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 1D04eO-1BMTya0; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 22:18:00 +0100 Received: from [10.0.0.3] (zaphod.das.netz [10.0.0.3]) by localhost.das.netz (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1CLGSWI031173 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 22:16:28 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from M.Santhoff@t-online.de) From: Marc Santhoff To: "FreeBSD stable (Liste)" Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1108243106.417.4.camel@zaphod.das.netz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 22:18:27 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ID: r3CJBGZGYeYRqF03hqM8QnhFBb+kanLZqSHxbyEfF9IqbZ6oXNNZ41 X-TOI-MSGID: 4775381a-b393-4098-8328-9d749476d4b2 Subject: timeout on boot with umass X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 21:18:09 -0000 Hi, I'm using a single board computer with freebsd 4-SATBLE. Attached to this thingy is a usb memory drive (not plugged, present at boot up) which takes approx. 15 seconds to show up as da0 after beeing detected by umass. Is there any possibility of reducing this time significantly? I would be happy with max. 5 second, less would be even better. ;) If this would demand some non standard changes to the usb code, I'll patch them in. TIA, Marc