From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 22 14:06:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 428D8106566C; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 14:06:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from tensor.andric.com (cl-327.ede-01.nl.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:7b8:2ff:146::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD4FC8FC12; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 14:06:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:0:64be:2ed2:2384:1368] (unknown [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:0:64be:2ed2:2384:1368]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tensor.andric.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DF7D75C37; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 15:06:09 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4EF33951.2010109@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 15:06:09 +0100 From: Dimitry Andric Organization: The FreeBSD Project User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111214 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adrian Chadd References: <201112211701.pBLH1DpL077981@svn.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r228783 - head/sys/conf X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 14:06:11 -0000 On 2011-12-22 09:43, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 21 December 2011 09:01, Dimitry Andric wrote: >> Author: dim >> Date: Wed Dec 21 17:01:13 2011 >> New Revision: 228783 >> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/228783 ... >> Both warnings are false positives, caused by LLVM PR 10030. For global >> initializations, clang fails to detect that the branch of the ternary >> operator causing the warning is dead. > .. and once this LLVM regression has been fixed, do you plan on > reverting this change to conf? Yes. The LLVM PR (really a Clang bug) can be followed here: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=10030 Since it is in there for quite some time already, I assume the problem is rather tricky to fix.