From owner-ctm-users@freebsd.org Sun Dec 23 17:21:17 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ctm-users@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA95133EA55 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2018 17:21:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: from mail-qt1-x834.google.com (mail-qt1-x834.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::834]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E8FB84D71 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2018 17:21:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: by mail-qt1-x834.google.com with SMTP id t13so11247763qtn.3 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2018 09:21:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=IUfRND7CJk3NE2L48iBRy3KzRdfnYL3M12/QV1hGXdY=; b=NDupt5rIMVqnfKKBO5gLLY5E8R6tE9XpHCWqFwzEHQNE7uuIKun6AvCzM/Dmj/m4wU sxztEiDL5w7G/phhntaiIuHJjkuAIWpa+BNFjqdVh2qV6PcyLucX3G6EDdgVgT7mwbMr QeMmQxDPobU0TgY8CDK0GgPRO5Y9tRnhUm2whZKBF38PgcQKvtlou/oj5byFYRz6kkr3 RBrJLCe54PQBLjatlcZnPF/XeX0L/3HRZJrLJSgaXomEp0L/8u/olWogHY9irAQ7SQV3 a/xqPGclNUqegBJbiWDowEkLLCLDyjOTycN5zg5a79QUbP7DTxyq+h0GgK/K06aYhzQn ayhQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=IUfRND7CJk3NE2L48iBRy3KzRdfnYL3M12/QV1hGXdY=; b=UjNG87gCNsGKXs6U++VBla9fhpq5iy6pMuOBqNellbE+wf2Gne6B7AxRaCn4ouRBoY itZmhLbbm1yp5CeKVjYHyh+0B5hQDtTN53RsN56XttV+cjiTgiOTkkFslpZ49bJdtogV eomh2QuvssHMD2xnhF1feiSrYXWWgps1VJK2V9HzeJH+ooRahvMPd2vZCfnAFoWh6fen wYeR9Voz2lJiDxKoFApw+wnQS5iNvlx3DP9Bv2Ukaq0SX2klGfxKTSRjNzBBTHqMO2ZK rBMGBN2JkLGXVfgAQ/sNxTi/etvW07kgrwZZ0niKSU4t1f5yk3CuOVioomSNyoFzJ8P0 Yo2w== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWbOIgTyuQm7NlJ91uWrAS9uRqZBvMoLeh59NPjtOO+ixfmW7FpX fDgrNBnGqn6VzWczIpALTK002Y5Rp1v8pg8p/pVb+Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN4Utpg+y93IAUGZCb2UvqM9lu53X6YwXEupFW9k6MvcvY3T+XJd63BwaSMQ9bGU4p8dxXgzIn9Yfxr3hckYPl8= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:42c1:: with SMTP id g1mr9633529qtm.118.1545585675993; Sun, 23 Dec 2018 09:21:15 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <201812220403.wBM430Oa099167@fire.js.berklix.net> <3b0c1217-92ed-779d-4f5c-fe5d6c74c578@missouri.edu> <475c68ee-8f54-7a61-b492-290837550ccf@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <475c68ee-8f54-7a61-b492-290837550ccf@freebsd.org> From: Warner Losh Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2018 10:21:05 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ctm(1) deprecation in the FreeBSD base system? To: Stefan Esser Cc: "Montgomery-Smith, Stephen" , "Julian H. Stacey" , Ed Maste , Poul-Henning Kamp , FreeBSD Current , "Rodney W. Grimes" , "ctm-users@freebsd.org" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 0E8FB84D71 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.96 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.96)[-0.960,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: ctm-users@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: CTM User discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2018 17:21:17 -0000 On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 12:27 AM Stefan Esser wrote: > Am 23.12.18 um 02:39 schrieb Montgomery-Smith, Stephen: > > On 12/21/18 10:03 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > >>> The port Makefile that I have prepared is attached below for reference. > >>> Regards, STefan > >> > >> Thanks Stefan, > >> I took current /usr/ports/misc/ctm/ > >> & converted Stephen's & my diffs to be automatic ports patches: > >> > http://berklix.com/~jhs/src/bsd/fixes/freebsd/ports/gen/misc/ctm/files/ > >> > http://berklix.com/~jhs/src/bsd/fixes/freebsd/ports/gen/misc/ctm/README.JHS > >> > >> Stephens diffs are essential, without them CTM broke long ago, > >> (5 digit numeric names maybe ?) > >> > >> I haven't checked all execution as my ctm_rmail scripts run > >> automaticaly on an older release, not my current box, but this is > >> running OK so far: > >> ctm -q /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/svn-cur.07000xEmpty.xz > ; > >> ctm -q > /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/svn-cur.07[0-9][0-9][0-9].xz > >> > >> Stephen may be best person to test delta builds, as hes the delta > originator. > >> > >> Soonish I'll set up a > >> [freebsd-]ctm-src-12 on http://mailman.berklix.org/mailman/listinfo > >> if Stephens' & my requests to postmaster @ & mailman @ freebsd.org > >> continues to get no response. > > > > Thank you for doing this, Stefan. The additional patches mentioned by > > Julian need to be included with the port before it can work and be > > tested. They are absolutely needed for the svn ctm deltas. > > Hi Stephen and Julian, > > I have converted the diffs into port patches (make makepatch) and > updated the man-page revision dates of ctm.8 and ctm_rmail.8. > > The port update has been committed as r488168. > > I hope this brings the port to the level required to make the CTM > port usable again. > > The patches could be imported to the Github repo (freebsd/ctm) after > testing, but for now the patched port should suffice ... > I'd prefer that we do that, since git is a lot easier for managing change that diffs in the tree, but I guess it isn't too urgent as the churn rate here will be small. Warner