From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 12 15:21:52 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A06DE16A468 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:21:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd2@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (Mail-03.name-services.com [64.74.223.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D6EF13C455 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:21:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd2@a1poweruser.com) Received: from laptop ([76.190.225.105]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 12 Jul 2007 08:24:32 -0700 From: "fbsd2" To: Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 11:21:50 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20070711174502.GB1435@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138 Importance: Normal X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Jul 2007 15:24:32.0884 (UTC) FILETIME=[BF6A5B40:01C7C498] Cc: Subject: RE: 10Mbps versus 100Mbps Cable Modems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd2@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:21:53 -0000 Am I missing some thing here? I though 10Mbps/100Mbps ends up controlling the max packet size traveling over the internet. So if your using 10Mbps, you end up generating 10 separate packets versus 1 packet at 100Mbps to move the same amount of data. This results in a network using 10Mbps to have more administrative overhead that a network using 100Mbps. This overhead on a heavily used network results in longer lag times in receiving replies.