Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 20 Nov 2014 12:57:26 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 194949] editors/emacs expects libMagickCore-6.Q16.so, yet graphics/ImageMagick provides libMagickCore-6.Q16HDRI.so
Message-ID:  <bug-194949-13-H5uPlBRdI8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-194949-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-194949-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194949

--- Comment #5 from Trond.Endrestol@ximalas.info ---
(In reply to martin.dieringer from comment #4)
> "This option is only half supported" (HDRI) What does that mean? By
> ImageMagick or emacs?

Read the extended help message shown by dialog4ports when configuring
graphics/ImageMagick, by enabling HDRI you also cause the ImageMagick libraries
to change names, or actually change their suffix.

editors/emacs OTOH always looks out for libMagickCore-6.Q16.so to establish
whether graphics/ImageMagick is installed or not. That test fails miserably if
the user, like me in this case, have chosen to enable HDRI, thus resulting in
libraries named libMagickCore-6.Q16HDRI.so, etc.

Currently editors/emacs is dying with segmentation fault while trying to
bytecompile image.el using temacs.

It's probably due to my configuration. Maybe I should create another PR for
this specific problem.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-194949-13-H5uPlBRdI8>