Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 12:57:26 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 194949] editors/emacs expects libMagickCore-6.Q16.so, yet graphics/ImageMagick provides libMagickCore-6.Q16HDRI.so Message-ID: <bug-194949-13-H5uPlBRdI8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-194949-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-194949-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194949 --- Comment #5 from Trond.Endrestol@ximalas.info --- (In reply to martin.dieringer from comment #4) > "This option is only half supported" (HDRI) What does that mean? By > ImageMagick or emacs? Read the extended help message shown by dialog4ports when configuring graphics/ImageMagick, by enabling HDRI you also cause the ImageMagick libraries to change names, or actually change their suffix. editors/emacs OTOH always looks out for libMagickCore-6.Q16.so to establish whether graphics/ImageMagick is installed or not. That test fails miserably if the user, like me in this case, have chosen to enable HDRI, thus resulting in libraries named libMagickCore-6.Q16HDRI.so, etc. Currently editors/emacs is dying with segmentation fault while trying to bytecompile image.el using temacs. It's probably due to my configuration. Maybe I should create another PR for this specific problem. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-194949-13-H5uPlBRdI8>