From owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 26 13:12:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9674106566B for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 13:12:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marc@blackend.org) Received: from abigail.blackend.org (ns0.blackend.org [82.227.222.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AB598FC2F for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 13:12:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marc@blackend.org) Received: from abigail.blackend.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by abigail.blackend.org (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n6QDCOXh041007 for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 15:12:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marc@abigail.blackend.org) Received: (from marc@localhost) by abigail.blackend.org (8.13.4/8.13.3/Submit) id n6QDCOS5041006 for freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 15:12:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marc) Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 15:12:24 +0200 From: Marc Fonvieille To: freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20090726131224.GA40957@abigail.blackend.org> References: <20090726125542.GA40587@abigail.blackend.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090726125542.GA40587@abigail.blackend.org> X-Useless-Header: blackend.org X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: Subject: Re: SANE, USB image scanner and -CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD support for USB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 13:12:28 -0000 On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 02:55:42PM +0200, Marc Fonvieille wrote: > Then I read the CVS logs about SANE's ports and > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/graphics/sane-backends/Makefile > seems to say that SANE is broken since removal of uscanner(8), am I > right? > Ok, I read the Makefile, SANE is by default w/o libusb support cause it's broken with libusb coming with 8.X so it's normal that the scanner is not found. Is there any plan in fixing that problem before 8.0-RELEASE? -- Marc