From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 26 22:55:21 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 238C816A4CE for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 22:55:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (Odin.AC.HMC.Edu [134.173.32.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D49DD43D31 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 22:55:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j0QMuR2S002871; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 14:56:27 -0800 Received: (from brdavis@localhost) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0/Submit) id j0QMuRUq002870; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 14:56:27 -0800 Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 14:56:27 -0800 From: Brooks Davis To: Sean Message-ID: <20050126225627.GA2190@odin.ac.hmc.edu> References: <41F81EAB.50004@comcast.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41F81EAB.50004@comcast.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=8.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on odin.ac.hmc.edu cc: amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bootloader X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 22:55:21 -0000 --tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 05:50:19PM -0500, Sean wrote: > I have noticed on bootup the loader states FreeBSD/i386 Bootstrap. >=20 > Is this correct when running the amd64 version of FBSD? The bootloader for amd64 is the same as the i386 one. The system starts in i386 mode for compatability and maintaining two loaders wouldn't accomplish much. So yes, I believe it's correct. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFB+CAaXY6L6fI4GtQRAjsVAJ9gIjmruVyxm5TcFe6KNiqkCoUQzgCfTBta d3KAjNCaNIIEDkK+sOIT6R4= =G/t/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT--