From owner-freebsd-security Thu Apr 16 13:59:32 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA00491 for freebsd-security-outgoing; Thu, 16 Apr 1998 13:59:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from burka.rdy.com (dima@burka.rdy.com [205.149.163.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA00419 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 1998 20:58:49 GMT (envelope-from dima@burka.rdy.com) Received: by burka.rdy.com id NAA09128; (8.8.8/RDY) Thu, 16 Apr 1998 13:58:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199804162058.NAA09128@burka.rdy.com> Subject: Re: kernel permissions In-Reply-To: from Robert Watson at "Apr 16, 98 04:43:36 pm" To: robert+freebsd@cyrus.watson.org Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1998 13:58:25 -0700 (PDT) Cc: rotel@indigo.ie, regnauld@deepo.prosa.dk, dima@best.net, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG X-Class: Fast Organization: HackerDome Reply-To: dima@best.net From: dima@best.net (Dima Ruban) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Robert Watson writes: > So, one possible concern might be for US residents that with developed > IPsec code in ones kernel (including encryption), ones kernel might no > longer be exportable :). We wouldn't want our users grabbing the kernel > code to run on their own machine :). > > (I know, a stretch, but...) Heh. Right. > > Robert N Watson > > > ---- > Carnegie Mellon University http://www.cmu.edu/ > Trusted Information Systems http://www.tis.com/ > SafePort Network Services http://www.safeport.com/ > robert@fledge.watson.org http://www.watson.org/~robert/ > -- dima To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe security" in the body of the message