From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 21 15:46:30 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37E9916A4CE for ; Sat, 21 May 2005 15:46:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3962543D78 for ; Sat, 21 May 2005 15:46:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ralf.folkerts@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 21 May 2005 15:46:25 -0000 Received: from dsl-084-056-148-078.arcor-ip.net (EHLO beaster) [84.56.148.78] by mail.gmx.net (mp010) with SMTP; 21 May 2005 17:46:25 +0200 X-Authenticated: #18511927 From: Ralf Folkerts To: Andreas Kohn In-Reply-To: <1116675388.23739.4.camel@klamath.syndrom23.de> References: <1116675388.23739.4.camel@klamath.syndrom23.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-/sjmiIEh2bFKnKWjFeul" Organization: Wohnzimmerrechenzentrum Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 17:46:25 +0200 Message-Id: <1116690385.808.18.camel@beaster> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Eclipse 3.1M7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 15:46:30 -0000 --=-/sjmiIEh2bFKnKWjFeul Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Samstag, den 21.05.2005, 13:36 +0200 schrieb Andreas Kohn: Hi Andreas, > there is a new milestone of Eclipse available, 3.1M7. It looks like > bigger parts of the build infrastructure have changed, and I'm thinking > about how to port it. Is anyone else working on it currently? >=20 > Actually, I think it would be easier to stop pretending that we are > linux sometimes, and sometimes not, and instead create a bigger patchset > which will add a complete freebsd OS definition. Perhaps our goal should > even be to have freebsd added to the list of supported OS's, to reduce > further porting effort for each new Eclipse code drop. >=20 > What do you guys think? well, I think if FreeBSD was added to the "officially" supported Platforms would be the best solution; after compiling a few 3.0-Milestones on FBSD I must admit that I gave up and waited for a Port by someone who is more knowledgable in C than I am; by that time the Docs were only for SWT 2, Info for SWT 3 was spread and the Eclipse-supplied Build-Infrastructure was, well, not really usable (in one Makefile there was eben a reference to ~jason/ibmjava (well, don't remember the name, but there was a reference to someone's Homedirectory). So, as long as FBSD is not "official" the Porter(s) will have the painful job to make changes over and over again, for each Milestone of each new Version :-( However, I have no Idea how to become an Official Eclipse Platform :-( Cheers, _ralf_ --=-/sjmiIEh2bFKnKWjFeul Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCj1fRY2jmDrUy5RMRAk7jAJ9soVKj/s5kTs0UQnXir3gGW7dZvACdEk71 VyVWpiHCezDXeipdRXIBczE= =6vW9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-/sjmiIEh2bFKnKWjFeul--