From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 8 23:04:47 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD69290 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 23:04:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from outbackdingo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-x22b.google.com (mail-ob0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 792561DF9 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 23:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f171.google.com with SMTP id dn14so6272532obc.30 for ; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 16:04:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=CmpTcAM8vT4iZbwUQe164KVfbSkJty4oMq9JU64MH7o=; b=pUFyzsGD9fQE/Z5cK/dD2we0yzkiC2BBBUZIn/xntDHrveQKL5n0uz8rNWkBqEn4Tb 4YD0ZoQC+4xdsq31fwe46KsVX2avClmyLnQmmZcNcR5uxURi87Qlss60z3ts5TOZVqBg SiPBLL3GwHoZcBs5NatFinBMDY9tKStf3hVRKegC/W+J6H/mHLPRlLIrMzEwIascrraF UGe+LuAob3msYZpa9NgyUzQp61wGx+nwZg8f75mSdi0RAZO1QFeo8Yf5xsXG3seqOZll C8NFIdovWV3UGchJFp3pDuyQLRjzvGvB1Cq8mCaXd9w8RBh4tPGrZRI1UMJiQxfdcJvZ U16w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.37.74 with SMTP id w10mr22066416oej.30.1373324686984; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 16:04:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.90.197 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 16:04:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <2014252440.3314312.1373322172877.JavaMail.root@uoguelph.ca> References: <87d2qt1tof.wl%berend@pobox.com> <2014252440.3314312.1373322172877.JavaMail.root@uoguelph.ca> Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 19:04:46 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Terrible NFS4 performance: FreeBSD 9.1 + ZFS + AWS EC2 From: Outback Dingo To: Rick Macklem Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-fs X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 23:04:47 -0000 On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Rick Macklem wrote: > Berend de Boer wrote: > > >>>>> "Rick" == Rick Macklem writes: > > > > Rick> Please try this patch: > > > > Hi Rick, > > > > Could you please reroll the patc hagainst 9.1-RELEASE? Not sure what > > version of FreeBSD you made this for. > I haven't a clue, either, to be honest;-) > > > I have 9.1-RELEASE. Get three > > failures: > > > I don't have a copy of 9.1-RELEASE handy, but here's one for stable/9. > If that still fails, just email and I'll download 9.1-RELEASE and create > one for it. > http://people.freebsd.org/~rmacklem/drc4-stable9.patch this patches cleanly against 9/stable updated as of 20 mins ago > > > rick > > > # patch --check -p0 < ~/drc4.patch > > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > > The text leading up to this was: > > -------------------------- > > |--- fs/nfsserver/nfs_nfsdcache.c.orig 2013-01-07 > > |09:04:13.000000000 -0500 > > |+++ fs/nfsserver/nfs_nfsdcache.c 2013-03-12 22:42:05.000000000 > > |-0400 > > -------------------------- > > Patching file fs/nfsserver/nfs_nfsdcache.c using Plan A... > > Hunk #1 succeeded at 160. > > Hunk #2 succeeded at 216. > > Hunk #3 succeeded at 271. > > Hunk #4 succeeded at 357. > > Hunk #5 succeeded at 370. > > Hunk #6 succeeded at 381. > > Hunk #7 succeeded at 396 with fuzz 2. > > Hunk #8 succeeded at 426. > > Hunk #9 succeeded at 444. > > Hunk #10 succeeded at 468. > > Hunk #11 failed at 476. > > Hunk #12 failed at 501. > > Hunk #13 succeeded at 523. > > Hunk #14 succeeded at 531. > > Hunk #15 succeeded at 547. > > Hunk #16 succeeded at 568. > > Hunk #17 succeeded at 579. > > Hunk #18 succeeded at 601. > > Hunk #19 succeeded at 665. > > Hunk #20 succeeded at 674. > > Hunk #21 failed at 683. > > Hunk #22 succeeded at 718. > > Hunk #23 succeeded at 729. > > Hunk #24 succeeded at 750. > > Hunk #25 succeeded at 779. > > Hunk #26 succeeded at 788. > > Hunk #27 succeeded at 803. > > Hunk #28 succeeded at 828. > > Hunk #29 succeeded at 927. > > Hunk #30 succeeded at 943. > > 3 out of 30 hunks failed--saving rejects to > > fs/nfsserver/nfs_nfsdcache.c.rej > > Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... > > The text leading up to this was: > > -------------------------- > > |--- fs/nfsserver/nfs_nfsdport.c.orig 2013-03-02 > 18:19:34.000000000 > > |-0500 > > |+++ fs/nfsserver/nfs_nfsdport.c 2013-03-12 17:51:31.000000000 > > |-0400 > > -------------------------- > > Patching file fs/nfsserver/nfs_nfsdport.c using Plan A... > > Hunk #1 succeeded at 59 with fuzz 1 (offset -2 lines). > > Hunk #2 succeeded at 3284 (offset -22 lines). > > Hunk #3 succeeded at 3351 with fuzz 1 (offset -5 lines). > > Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... > > The text leading up to this was: > > -------------------------- > > |--- fs/nfs/nfsport.h.orig 2013-03-02 18:35:13.000000000 -0500 > > |+++ fs/nfs/nfsport.h 2013-03-12 17:51:31.000000000 -0400 > > -------------------------- > > Patching file fs/nfs/nfsport.h using Plan A... > > Hunk #1 succeeded at 547 (offset -62 lines). > > Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... > > The text leading up to this was: > > -------------------------- > > |--- fs/nfs/nfsrvcache.h.orig 2013-01-07 09:04:15.000000000 -0500 > > |+++ fs/nfs/nfsrvcache.h 2013-03-12 18:02:42.000000000 -0400 > > -------------------------- > > Patching file fs/nfs/nfsrvcache.h using Plan A... > > Hunk #1 succeeded at 41. > > done > > > > > > I just want to make sure I can apply it cleanly and that it's not a > > mistake I made when making this work when it doesn't. > > > > -- > > All the best, > > > > Berend de Boer > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Awesome Drupal hosting: https://www.xplainhosting.com/ > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >