From owner-freebsd-current Wed Nov 5 08:42:37 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id IAA20430 for current-outgoing; Wed, 5 Nov 1997 08:42:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current) Received: from opus.cts.cwu.edu (skynyrd@opus.cts.cwu.edu [198.104.92.71]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA20425 for ; Wed, 5 Nov 1997 08:42:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from skynyrd@opus.cts.cwu.edu) Received: from localhost (skynyrd@localhost) by opus.cts.cwu.edu (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id IAA24817; Wed, 5 Nov 1997 08:38:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from skynyrd@opus.cts.cwu.edu) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 1997 08:38:10 -0800 (PST) From: Chris Timmons To: Evan Champion cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: operator not member of group operator? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I get burned by this every time I set up amanda and make /etc/dumpdates group operator, group writeable. If no-one has changed this yet, any objections? -Chris On Tue, 4 Nov 1997, Evan Champion wrote: > Is there any particular reason why user operator is not a member of group > operator? > > The user operator itself is kind of useless; being a member of group > operator is what makes operator what it is -- the userid that dumps are > done as. It can't do its job the way it is currently defined... > > Evan >