From nobody Tue Nov 2 19:49:03 2021
X-Original-To: python@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDB22182FE69
for <python@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org>; Tue, 2 Nov 2021 19:49:04 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256
client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256)
(Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK))
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HkL7g3LYgz4h8q
for <python@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 2 Nov 2021 19:49:03 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
(Client did not present a certificate)
by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 388AB3043
for <python@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 2 Nov 2021 19:49:03 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5])
by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 1A2Jn3QA041326
for <python@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 2 Nov 2021 19:49:03 GMT
(envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: (from www@localhost)
by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 1A2Jn32w041325
for python@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 2 Nov 2021 19:49:03 GMT
(envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: python@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 249337] [meta] Ports broken by Python 2.7 End-of-Life and
removal
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2021 19:49:03 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People
X-Bugzilla-Who: ahmedsayeed1982@yahoo.com
X-Bugzilla-Status: Open
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: python@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-249337-21822-5O3BqOArxP@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-249337-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-249337-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Python issues <freebsd-python.freebsd.org>
List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-python
List-Help: <mailto:python+help@freebsd.org>
List-Post: <mailto:python@freebsd.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:python+subscribe@freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:python+unsubscribe@freebsd.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-python@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-python@freebsd.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D249337
Ahmed <ahmedsayeed1982@yahoo.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ahmedsayeed1982@yahoo.com
--- Comment #16 from Ahmed <ahmedsayeed1982@yahoo.com> ---
In collect_register() function of arc-linux-tdep.c, the "eret"
http://www-look-4.com/travel/london/
(exception return) register value is not being reported correctly.
Background: https://komiya-dental.com/shopping/buy-android/
When asked for the "pc" value, we have to update the "eret" register
with GDB's STOP_PC. The "eret" instructs the kernel code where to
jump back http://www.iu-bloomington.com/shopping/hatchback-cars/ when an
instruction has stopped due to a breakpoint. This
is how collect_register() is doing so:
https://waytowhatsnext.com/shopping/xbox-release-date/
--------------8<--------------
if (regnum =3D=3D gdbarch_pc_regnum (gdbarch))
http://www.wearelondonmade.com/travel/london/
regnum =3D ARC_ERET_REGNUM;
regcache->raw_collect (regnum, buf + arc_linux_core_reg_offsets[regnum]);
-------------->8-------------- http://www.jopspeech.com/travel/london/
Root cause:
Although this is using the correct offset (ERET register's), it is also
http://joerg.li/travel/london/=20
changing the REGNUM itself. Therefore, raw_collect (regnum, ...) is
not reading from "pc" anymore. http://connstr.net/travel/london/
Consequence:
This bug affects the "native ARC gdb" badly and causes kernel code to jump
to addresses after the breakpoint and not executing the "breakpoint"ed
http://embermanchester.uk/travel/london/=20
instructions at all. That "native ARC gdb" feature is not upstream yet and
is in review at the time of writing [1].
http://www.slipstone.co.uk/travel/london/
In collect_register() function of arc-linux-tdep.c, the "eret"
(exception return) register value is not being reported correctly.
http://www.logoarts.co.uk/travel/london/
Background:
When asked for the "pc" value, we have to update the "eret" register
with GDB's STOP_PC. http://www.acpirateradio.co.uk/travel/good/ The "eret"
instructs the kernel code where to
jump back when an instruction has stopped due to a breakpoint. This
is how collect_register() is doing so:
http://www.compilatori.com/travel/london/
--------------8<--------------
if (regnum =3D=3D gdbarch_pc_regnum (gdbarch))
regnum =3D ARC_ERET_REGNUM;
regcache->raw_collect (regnum, buf + arc_linux_core_reg_offsets[regnum]);
-------------->8--------------
Root cause: https://www.webb-dev.co.uk/shopping/shopping-during-corona/
Although this is using the correct offset (ERET register's), it is also
changing the REGNUM itself. Therefore, raw_collect (regnum, ...) is
not reading from "pc" anymore.
Consequence:
This bug affects the "native ARC gdb" badly and causes kernel code to jump
to addresses after the breakpoint and not executing the "breakpoint"ed
instructions at all. That "native ARC gdb" feature is not upstream yet and
is in review at the time of writing [1].
--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=