From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jul 15 14:33:02 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB1AE99B44F for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 14:33:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timp87@gmail.com) Received: from mbob.nabble.com (mbob.nabble.com [162.253.133.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C4AC1081 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 14:33:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timp87@gmail.com) Received: from msam.nabble.com (unknown [162.253.133.85]) by mbob.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D46B51139484 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 07:33:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 07:33:00 -0700 (MST) From: timp To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1436970780679-6025493.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <20150715150155.59642307@gumby.homeunix.com> References: <20150714205428.367d2be0@gumby.homeunix.com> <1436935179854-6025395.post@n5.nabble.com> <20150715120726.35a59c3e@gumby.homeunix.com> <20150715150155.59642307@gumby.homeunix.com> Subject: Re: www/squid's cache dir MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 14:33:03 -0000 > > Ok, so you don't see the difference too, do you? > > Actually I do see the difference - I think the current layout is > better. My point was that "I can't see any difference" isn't a good > argument for making disruptive change. > > > I think it's obvious that putting multiple caches under one squid > directory is better than having multiple squid directories. Well, yes, in most cases. > > The point is get rid of dirs which we don't really need for this port, > > and place cache to suitable dir which is made in base system for such > > purposes. > > Just for order. You think it's bad idea? > > > I think it's cleaner to have a default location for squid caches, > rather than just a default cache location. There's an unnecessary > directory to the same extent as there is with a single home directory > under /home. > > Whether squid goes under /var or /var/cache is a completely different > issue. In the second case you would need /var/cache/squid/cache. I like the /var/cache/squid/cache variant =) It looks too long though. About a half of a year cache dir was hided a bit deeper. https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=373442 Is it your commit? Sorry, I can't see your name, just a name of mail list. Do you think logs should be under /var/squid too (now empty /var/squid/logs dir)? > Please don't top-post. I'm sorry! I'll do my best. Does anyone have any other opinion? -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/www-squid-s-cache-dir-tp6025127p6025493.html Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com.