From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 25 22:49:37 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3833F16A41A for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:49:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists-fbsd@shadypond.com) Received: from mx-outbound01.easydns.com (mailout.easydns.com [205.210.42.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE80A13C45B for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:49:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists-fbsd@shadypond.com) Received: from slider.shadypond.com (69-12-173-117.static.humboldt1.com [69.12.173.117]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx-outbound01.easydns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4881B7F72 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 18:49:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from slider.shadypond.com (slider.shadypond.com [192.168.1.11]) by slider.shadypond.com (postoffice) with ESMTP id 8C706B65A9 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:49:26 +0000 (UTC) From: Pollywog To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:49:25 +0000 References: <20070925013723.GA50027@thought.org> <20070925182855.GH50519@thought.org> <20070925222147.GB2513@kobe.laptop> In-Reply-To: <20070925222147.GB2513@kobe.laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200709252249.25904.lists-fbsd@shadypond.com> Subject: Re: sed question... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:49:37 -0000 On Tuesday 25 September 2007 22:21:48 Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > A word of caution there... > > If you plan to use GNU/Linux manpages for learning sed(1) be _very_ > cautious for GNU/Linux-specific parts. There are subtle, yet possibly > important differences between GNU/Linux sed and BSD sed. > I am generally aware that sometimes there are differences between the utilities used with Linux and their BSD counterparts. As for the differences themselves, do they exist because someone has "reinvented" the utilities or is there perhaps another reason?