Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 14:00:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Darrel <levitch@iglou.com> To: Matthew Seaman <matthew@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [solved]: to move csup 90 to subversion 91rc Message-ID: <alpine.GSO.2.00.1209031342130.6464@shell1> In-Reply-To: <5044DC50.7020806@FreeBSD.org> References: <alpine.GSO.2.00.1209031147260.6464@shell1> <44ehmj1354.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <5044DC50.7020806@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>> For ports would it be better to match -fbsd91, like this: >>> svn co http://svn.freebsd.org/ports/releng/9.1 ports > > > On 03/09/2012 17:29, Lowell Gilbert wrote: >> I'm not sure whether there's any equivalent to tracking RELENG_9 (as >> opposed to tracking RELENG_9_1) under the branching scheme being used >> with subversion. > > stable/9 is the SVN equivalent of RELENG_9 > > Could I then run: svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/releng/[ 91 9.1] /usr/ports/ or | and svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/stable/9 /usr/ports/ ? Since in the past several years I installed minimal fbsd and then used portsnap for ports, so I was not aware that -head was the only option for ports- is that what Lowell was pointing out? It turns out that mergemaster would have been alright in my case, due to .mergemasterrc, I can not recall why this was selected, comments are welcomed: # cat .mergemasterrc FREEBSD_ID=YES VERBOSE=YES AUTO_INSTALL=YES RUN_UPDATES=YES COMP_CONFS=YES PRESERVE_FILES_DIR=/var/tmp/mergemaster/preserved-files-`date +%y%m%d-%H%M%S` DELETE_STALE_RC_FILES=YES Kind regards, Darrel
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.GSO.2.00.1209031342130.6464>