From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 15 06:21:28 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B0CB16A4CE; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 06:21:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cs.rice.edu (cs.rice.edu [128.42.1.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D4BB43D2D; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 06:21:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alc@cs.rice.edu) Received: from localhost (calypso.cs.rice.edu [128.42.1.127]) by cs.rice.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD90E4A9A4; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 00:21:27 -0600 (CST) Received: from cs.rice.edu ([128.42.1.30]) by localhost (calypso.cs.rice.edu [128.42.1.127]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 14457-01-85; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 00:21:27 -0600 (CST) Received: by cs.rice.edu (Postfix, from userid 19572) id 7F4484A99E; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 00:21:27 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 00:21:27 -0600 From: Alan Cox To: John Baldwin Message-ID: <20050215062127.GA27360@cs.rice.edu> References: <200502082025.j18KP72E069507@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050214001550.GA59689@dragon.nuxi.com> <346a802205021410425515fec@mail.gmail.com> <200502141630.56868.jhb@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200502141630.56868.jhb@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavis-20030616-p7 at cs.rice.edu cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: obrien@FreeBSD.org cc: cokane@cokane.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/i386 apic_vector.s local_apic.c mp_machdep.c src/sys/i386/include apicvar.h smp.h src/sys/i386/isa clock.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 06:21:28 -0000 On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 04:30:56PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > On Monday 14 February 2005 01:42 pm, Coleman Kane wrote: > > I've been testing these since they were posted. All is well thus far! > > I need perf numbers though. They should work fine, but I really don't know if > they will help or hurt performance. Also, the perf characteristics are > likely different on UP vs SMP. In regards to the changes to atomic.h, I'm curious why you didn't make the output of lfence and sfence conditional on SMP, like the output of the lock prefix is? Alan