From owner-freebsd-doc  Mon Apr 21 12:33:17 1997
Return-Path: <owner-doc>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA08872
          for doc-outgoing; Mon, 21 Apr 1997 12:33:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fallout.campusview.indiana.edu (fallout.campusview.indiana.edu [149.159.1.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA08863
          for <doc@freebsd.org>; Mon, 21 Apr 1997 12:33:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (jfieber@localhost)
	by fallout.campusview.indiana.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA22393;
	Mon, 21 Apr 1997 14:32:24 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 1997 14:32:24 -0500 (EST)
From: John Fieber <jfieber@indiana.edu>
To: Gary Clark II <gclarkii@main.gbdata.com>
cc: doc@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: LaTeX support
In-Reply-To: <199704211904.OAA11497@main.gbdata.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970421142310.6598e-100000@fallout.campusview.indiana.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-doc@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 21 Apr 1997, Gary Clark II wrote:

> Maybe, since LaTeX is the best way to get a decent hardcopy of the sources.
> If this is taken out, then we need to get the groff versions up to snuff
> (page numbers and such).

Okay, I'll bite.  What is wrong with the groff version?

(Note: I'm talking about FreeBSD 2.2 and later, not 2.1 for which
your statement is definately true.)

-john