From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 15 17:40:44 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3867E16A4D0 for ; Sun, 15 May 2005 17:40:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from newtrinity.zeist.de (newtrinity.zeist.de [217.24.217.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8852D43DDA for ; Sun, 15 May 2005 17:40:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marius@newtrinity.zeist.de) Received: from newtrinity.zeist.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) j4FHegGo016088; Sun, 15 May 2005 19:40:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marius@newtrinity.zeist.de) Received: (from marius@localhost) by newtrinity.zeist.de (8.12.11/8.12.10/Submit) id j4FHebtu016087; Sun, 15 May 2005 19:40:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marius) Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 19:40:37 +0200 From: Marius Strobl To: Steven Hillis Message-ID: <20050515194037.C15193@newtrinity.zeist.de> References: <34059453050515070024b2c2e9@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <34059453050515070024b2c2e9@mail.gmail.com>; from evultrole@gmail.com on Sun, May 15, 2005 at 07:00:41AM -0700 X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter (version: 1.1.0-4; AVE: 6.30.0.12; VDF: 6.30.0.177; host: newtrinity.zeist.de) cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: jumping to kernel entry - 5.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 17:40:44 -0000 On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 07:00:41AM -0700, Steven Hillis wrote: > Had the same problem on my Ultra 10. > > While this isn't really a fix for the problem, it will probably get you there... > > 5.3 installs without any trouble, so if you just do a source upgrade > from there you'll probably be ok... just takes awhile > > I didn't try the generic kernel config, but my custom kernel ran more > or less just fine > > > > > Along the lines of kernel upgrades, any word on why the new uart > driver makes the system ignore 7/8 of my keystrokes on my RS232 > keyboard? I've seen a couple other people mention it, but haven't seen > any word as to why yet... > Do you by chance have both ofw_console(4) and uart(4) enabled in the same kernel? This will cause havoc. If not the performance of ofw_console(4) might improve if you use the OFWCONS_POLL_HZ option in your kernel config file and set it to e.g. 20 or 25.