Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 15:10:14 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: HEADS UP: GNOME package server open for business Message-ID: <20040302231014.GA22443@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20040302224627.GB95640@ns1.xcllnt.net> References: <1078259815.762.35.camel@gyros> <20040302215728.GA95434@ns1.xcllnt.net> <20040302223246.GA21936@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040302224627.GB95640@ns1.xcllnt.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--J/dobhs11T7y2rNN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 02:46:27PM -0800, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 02:32:47PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 01:57:28PM -0800, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 03:36:55PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > > > I have completed work on the GNOME package building tinderbox. Pac= kages > > > > for all supported versions of FreeBSD (i386 only) are available, or= will > > > > be available soon. > > >=20 > > > Any chance to have this on pluto1 for ia64 packages? I typically > > > build GNOME from scratch there after some major update (either core > > > OS or GNOME itself). > >=20 > > bento already builds GNOME using pluto[12] as part of the main package > > cycle. >=20 > I know, but the only way for people to actually fix the ports on > ia64 that depend on GNOME, is by having GNOME installed on an ia64 > box to which developers have access. That's why pluto1 has GNOME > and pluto2 has KDE. I need to keep the installation somewhat up > to date. The GNOME tinderbox isn't going to solve that, unless you install the packages it produces. But you could just install the packages bento produces already. > > One problem is that the two pluto machines are pretty slow and > > continue to have stability problems, so finishing a build can take a > > long time and typically requires a lot of restarts to recover from the > > build machine failures. >=20 > I'm working on that. Good to hear :) > > Adding to the workload by trying to do parallel builds of GNOME at the > > same time doesn't sound like a good solution to me though. >=20 > The ia64 machines in the cluster are shared by everyone, including > release engineering. Such is life... That still doesn't make it a good idea to load them down further with duplicate builds. Kris --J/dobhs11T7y2rNN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFARRRWWry0BWjoQKURAurNAJ9Gc016vL2rrXGIyEIEbfWkgNNSSQCeOuKH 6IGLXg0g5sCAuMADCwQom/0= =Y/4G -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --J/dobhs11T7y2rNN--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040302231014.GA22443>