From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 24 09:33:46 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DC21846 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 09:33:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost1.greenhost.nl (smarthost1.greenhost.nl [195.190.28.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 191AA8C1 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 09:33:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.greenhost.nl ([213.108.104.138]) by smarthost1.greenhost.nl with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1YaLCI-0005RZ-95; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 10:33:41 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: "Paul Mather" , "Jason Birch" Subject: Re: BBB freebsd-current backtrace. why? References: <85F7C686-B0D3-4A48-9180-C0BA9C7DD651@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 10:32:28 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Ronald Klop" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/1.0 (Win32) X-Authenticated-As-Hash: 398f5522cb258ce43cb679602f8cfe8b62a256d1 X-Virus-Scanned: by clamav at smarthost1.samage.net X-Spam-Level: / X-Spam-Score: 0.8 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, BAYES_50, FUZZY_VPILL, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 X-Scan-Signature: f0eed3f1d89bc5fb772880ef8d54351a Cc: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 09:33:46 -0000 On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 04:22:16 +0100, Jason Birch wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 1:29 AM, Paul Mather > wrote: > >> >> Related to what Ian said (re: the LOR list not being actively maintained >> any more)... >> >> > Is there value in someone stepping up and maintaining a LOR archive? The > disconnect between "Always have this on and report it" and "Nobody seems > to > know or care" is disheartening. I'm sure there are people who care for > which this information is very useful, of course. > > Would I be setting myself up for a world of pain if I raised my hand to > do > something like this? On the face of it, it seems simple enough, but I > haven't been involved in the community long enough to know if it'd be > problematic or valuable. It just seems like we should either 1) Care > about > WITNESS by default or 2) Not care about WITNESS by default, instead of > straddin' it. JB, See this: http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/lor.html https://wiki.freebsd.org/LOR And this: http://www.daemonology.net/blog/2013-11-06-automated-freebsd-panic-reporting.html I'm not involved in these sites, but maybe that is a good starting point. Regards, Ronald. > > JB > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"