From owner-freebsd-mobile Thu Jan 11 7:44:52 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from tasogare.imasy.or.jp (tasogare.imasy.or.jp [202.227.24.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5059637B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2001 07:44:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (iwasaki.imasy.or.jp [202.227.24.92]) by tasogare.imasy.or.jp (8.11.1+3.4W/3.7W-tasogare/smtpfeed 1.07) with ESMTP id f0BFiQk84614; Fri, 12 Jan 2001 00:44:26 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org) To: amarkelov@futures.msk.ru Cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PAO or CURRENT/STABLE/RELEASE In-Reply-To: <53194758477.20010111163908@futures.msk.ru> References: <53194758477.20010111163908@futures.msk.ru> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.1 on Emacs 19.34 / Mule 2.3 (SUETSUMUHANA) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20010112004423N.iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 00:44:23 +0900 From: Mitsuru IWASAKI X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140) Lines: 14 Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > is there any great differences between PAO3 and > 3-STABLE/CURRENT/RELEASE ? I want to install FreeBSD on my ThinkPad > 760ED and want to choose one. As I saw at PAO home, they want to add > all APM changes in CURRENT cvs tree. Is it already there? > > Please help what version is better for notebook. As far as I can tell, most of APM code were merged from PAO3 into CURRENT, RELENG_4 and RELENG_3 already. Also most of PAO active developers became committer and PAO3 development is going to end. So I'd recommend you to choose RELENG_4 or CURRENT, not PAO3, and report any problems to improve plain FreeBSD. Thanks To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message