From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Mar 31 11:38:59 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id LAA01553 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 31 Mar 1995 11:38:59 -0800 Received: from gndrsh.aac.dev.com (gndrsh.aac.dev.com [198.145.92.241]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id LAA01537 for ; Fri, 31 Mar 1995 11:38:52 -0800 Received: (from rgrimes@localhost) by gndrsh.aac.dev.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) id LAA09146; Fri, 31 Mar 1995 11:37:59 -0800 From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <199503311937.LAA09146@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> Subject: Re: Bind 4.9.3 beta 17 To: guido@IAEhv.nl (Guido van Rooij) Date: Fri, 31 Mar 1995 11:37:58 -0800 (PST) Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199503311914.VAA06147@iaehv.IAEhv.nl> from "Guido van Rooij" at Mar 31, 95 09:14:15 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 996 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > smb@research.att.com wrote: > > > > Start using it now; 4.9.3 beta 17 is much more reliable than most > > vendor code I've seen. And there are important security benefits as > > well -- Paul Vixie will be presenting a companion paper to mine > > that describes how he fixed lots of holes. > > > > --Steve Bellovin > > > > > > I saw this on a list; but I can't find anywhere which version of bind > we are using. Can someone tell me? >From the cvs log files: ---------------------------- revision 1.1 date: 1994/09/22 19:46:12; author: pst; state: Exp; branches: 1.1.1; Initial revision ---------------------------- revision 1.1.1.1 date: 1994/09/22 19:46:13; author: pst; state: Exp; lines: +0 -0 NAMED from BIND 4.9.3 BETA9 pl1 (no local changes) ---------------------------- Looks like we are at 4.9.3 BETA9 to me... -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com Accurate Automation Company Custom computers for FreeBSD