From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 21 04:45:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C956E16A401 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 04:45:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darren.pilgrim@bitfreak.org) Received: from mail.bitfreak.org (mail.bitfreak.org [65.75.198.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E16B43D46 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 04:45:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from darren.pilgrim@bitfreak.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (mail.bitfreak.org [65.75.198.146]) by mail.bitfreak.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17CB019F2C; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 20:45:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <441F84F1.4090303@bitfreak.org> Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 20:45:37 -0800 From: Darren Pilgrim User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Max Laier References: <441F274D.1030107@bitfreak.org> <200603210038.28520.max@love2party.net> In-Reply-To: <200603210038.28520.max@love2party.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New version of iwi(4) - Call for testers [regression!] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 04:45:41 -0000 Max Laier wrote: > > Let me clear up some things here: > 1) This is not "mine" driver. It's Damien's with a lot of patches that I hope > to test by putting out this version. My sincerest apologies to Damien and everyone involved. I was going by historical convention where when someone posts a new, out-of-tree driver or patch-set it's "theirs." Further following tradition, how does "iwiNG" sound? > 3) The aim is to merge the changes in "my" driver to CVS modulo regressions. > That is why I am mostly interested in side-by-side testing. I will put out a > new tarball later this week that will help with that. If you already did > some such testing, I'd be happy to hear your results. Using the stock driver, I get hard lock-ups during interface configuration, wpa_supplicant crashes, dhclient crashes, firmware "fatal errors" and device wedges that require a reboot. In the same world and kernel, the iwiNG driver has absolutely none of these problems.