From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 19 17:10:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 151C516A4CE for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 17:10:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org (melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org [82.225.155.84]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 768D043D54 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 17:10:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thomas@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: by melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6B3172C3D3; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 19:10:17 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 19:10:17 +0200 From: Thomas Quinot To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren?= Schmidt Message-ID: <20041019171017.GA33445@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> References: <20041013205141.GA874@galgenberg.net> <416DA856.9040703@vbservices.net> <20041015093908.GA11176@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> <20041018234324.GA1270@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> <4174B366.9010508@DeepCore.dk> <20041019165749.GA33059@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> <4175497F.2000501@DeepCore.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <4175497F.2000501@DeepCore.dk> X-message-flag: WARNING! Using Outlook can damage your computer. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: Michael Joyner cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: atapicam(4) as KLD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 17:10:20 -0000 * Søren Schmidt, 2004-10-19 : > But I do, just adding in the atapicam glue add even more kludges which I > dont want. We are not talking of atapicam-specific glue or jkudges here, on the contrary I am suggesting using the generic functions from the NEWBUS frameworks to make ata behave as a proper bus *in place* of the ad hoc atapicam glue. > It was talked about on IRC long time ago in connection with making ATA > truely modular. Hmmm, OK, so let's consider that as completely lost since we have no traces of it. > helpfull for that purpose. I'll try to locate that tree in the woods > here, maybe that could be turned into what we want. > So, as usual, I'm working on it :/ Great, thanks! Please let me know if I can be of some help. Thomas. -- Thomas.Quinot@Cuivre.FR.EU.ORG