From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 21 1:12:32 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mailgate.abacus.co.uk (mailgate.abacus.co.uk [194.130.48.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C35537B6E3 for ; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 01:12:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from antony@abacus.co.uk) Received: from abacus.co.uk (IDENT:antony@pcantony.bl.abacus.co.uk [194.130.48.111]) by mailgate.abacus.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA29421; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 09:33:56 +0100 Message-ID: <3977F70E.D3DB5A92@abacus.co.uk> Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 08:09:02 +0100 From: Antony T Curtis Organization: Abacus Polar PLC (UK) X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.4.0-test4 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Baldwin Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.1-RC2 up for grabs References: <200007210605.XAA41102@pike.osd.bsdi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG John Baldwin wrote: > While the newer X bits have several advantages such as being 4.1 binaries > rather than 3.x binaries and supporting the i810, they most likely won't be > used if I cannot resolve the PC98 issue in the next day or so. Please test > this out and give us feedback. Thanks. Would this mean that I can use FreeBSD 4.1 on a i810 mobo? That'd be great - at the moment, I'm having to use a Linux 2.4 beta kernel system on my desktop at work... And moving back to FreeBSD is something I really want to do. -- ANTONY T CURTIS Tel: +44 (1635) 36222 Abacus Polar Holdings Ltd Fax: +44 (1635) 38670 Your fortune : "Show business is just like high school, except you get paid." - Martin Mull To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message