From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Tue Oct 6 06:15:21 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 561AD99A5B6 for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 06:15:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ck-lists@cksoft.de) Received: from mx1.cksoft.de (mx1.cksoft.de [IPv6:2001:67c:24f8:1::25:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx1.cksoft.de", Issuer "CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 044A2C50 for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 06:15:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ck-lists@cksoft.de) Received: from m.cksoft.de (m.cksoft.de [212.17.240.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ED5041E9EB2; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 08:15:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from amavis.cksoft.de (unknown [IPv6:2a01:170:1110:8001::25:a1]) by m.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6181D631D0; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 08:13:47 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cksoft.de Received: from m.cksoft.de ([192.168.64.93]) by amavis.cksoft.de (amavis.cksoft.de [192.168.64.94]) (amavisd-new, port 10041) with ESMTP id RZYaegD6XP95; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 08:13:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from noc1.cksoft.de (noc1.cksoft.de [IPv6:2a01:170:1110:8001::53:1]) by m.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90D8862F88; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 08:13:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: by noc1.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9E45313BCB; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 08:15:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by noc1.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97BA013BCA; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 08:15:14 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 08:15:14 +0200 (CEST) From: Christian Kratzer X-X-Sender: ck@noc1.cksoft.de Reply-To: Christian Kratzer To: dweimer cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: smbfs crashes since approx. 10.1-RELEASE In-Reply-To: <543b298ddfd6fffaf138c913a650519a@dweimer.net> Message-ID: References: <1721669289.24365403.1444083414400.JavaMail.zimbra@uoguelph.ca> <543b298ddfd6fffaf138c913a650519a@dweimer.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) X-Spammer-Kill-Ratio: 75% MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 06:15:21 -0000 Hi, On Mon, 5 Oct 2015, dweimer wrote: >>> root@noc2:/var/crash # freebsd-version -u >>> 10.2-RELEASE-p5 >>> root@noc2:/var/crash # freebsd-version -k >>> 10.2-RELEASE > > Shouldn't the kernel version also be 10.2-RELEASE-p5? Perhaps the user land > being different than the kernel is causing an issue? > > root@freebsd:/home/dweimer # uname -a > FreeBSD freebsd.dweimer.local 10.2-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 10.2-RELEASE-p5 #1 > r288512: Fri Oct 2 13:54:14 CDT 2015 > dweimer@freebsd.dweimer.local:/jails/devel/ROOT/usr/obj/jails/devel/ROOT/usr/src/sys/GENERIC > amd64 > root@freebsd:/home/dweimer # freebsd-version -u > 10.2-RELEASE-p5 > root@freebsd:/home/dweimer # freebsd-version -k > 10.2-RELEASE-p5 as this system is maintained by freebsd-update and there have been no kernel changes from release to p5 the kernel is still showing 10.2-RELEASE. It is normal for systems updated by freebsd-update that the kernel version lags behind the userland. Greetings Christian -- Christian Kratzer CK Software GmbH Email: ck@cksoft.de Wildberger Weg 24/2 Phone: +49 7032 893 997 - 0 D-71126 Gaeufelden Fax: +49 7032 893 997 - 9 HRB 245288, Amtsgericht Stuttgart Mobile: +49 171 1947 843 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Christian Kratzer Web: http://www.cksoft.de/