From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 9 18:53:22 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5416A1065706 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2009 18:53:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout016.mac.com (asmtpout016.mac.com [17.148.16.91]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39DCF8FC22 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2009 18:53:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Received: from cswiger1.apple.com ([17.227.140.124]) by asmtp016.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0KHU00H95KGXJ950@asmtp016.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 11:53:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-id: <33DDA874-7A10-4B50-B97E-37356758ED2F@mac.com> From: Chuck Swiger To: Gary Gatten In-reply-to: <70C0964126D66F458E688618E1CD008A0793E95C@WADPEXV0.waddell.com> Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 11:53:21 -0700 References: <49DCA9E0.6000109@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <49DD0A57.7020701@freebsd.org> <49DE28D8.1020508@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <70C0964126D66F458E688618E1CD008A0793E957@WADPEXV0.waddell.com> <20090409134659.58922787@att.net> <70C0964126D66F458E688618E1CD008A0793E95A@WADPEXV0.waddell.com> <70C0964126D66F458E688618E1CD008A0793E95C@WADPEXV0.waddell.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make install krb5 conflict with heimdal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 18:53:23 -0000 On Apr 9, 2009, at 11:29 AM, Gary Gatten wrote: > This actually makes a little sense - thanks for the pointers! > > G > > BTW: Is top posting bad? I prefer top posts, but if the list doesn't > like it I'll change. I'll find the rules and read them! Top posting is widely considered bad on the FreeBSD lists, yes. Note that Kerberos is a complicated, many-headed beast and not just in the mythological sense. You might have an easier time if you choose which flavor you want to use, and then maybe add WITH_KERBEROS=yes and/ or WITH_HEIMDAL=yes to /etc/make.conf, before firing off the tree of builds-- that will help the various ports and options screens figure out which one you wanted to use more consistently. However, it looks like Samba is looking for HEIMDAL_HOME or KRB5_HOME to be defined instead of using the standard WITH_ flags; arguably, the port maintainer dwcjr@ should be checking the WITH_ flags instead. Regards, -- -Chuck