From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Feb 22 18:46:12 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C2AE63A;
 Fri, 22 Feb 2013 18:46:12 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bschmidt@techwires.net)
Received: from mx.techwires.net (mx.techwires.net [79.140.39.242])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04C46226;
 Fri, 22 Feb 2013 18:46:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from amy.lab.techwires.net (dslb-088-067-212-155.pools.arcor-ip.net
 [88.67.212.155])
 by mx.techwires.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7905630A8A9;
 Fri, 22 Feb 2013 19:46:04 +0100 (CET)
From: Bernhard Schmidt <bschmidt@techwires.net>
To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: kern/176201: [net80211] [patch] 11n station includes unrelated ht
 params into ASSOC_REQ packet
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 19:47:24 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.1-STABLE; KDE/4.9.5; amd64; ; )
References: <201302180246.r1I2kocv064092@freefall.freebsd.org>
 <201302221933.25718.bschmidt@techwires.net>
 <CAJ-Vmom9sE0dMXCp2Tn=DUFTGhgpH+W2uDHpv5VeDL3+3RgJsw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmom9sE0dMXCp2Tn=DUFTGhgpH+W2uDHpv5VeDL3+3RgJsw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201302221947.24307.bschmidt@techwires.net>
Cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org, PseudoCylon <moonlightakkiy@yahoo.ca>,
 freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-bugs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 18:46:12 -0000

On Friday, February 22, 2013 07:34:30 PM Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Why isn't it a per-node thing for the AP case?
> 
> Ie, what should the AP do if the ampdu density it supports is 0 but
> the STA AMPDU density on the RX side is 8?

What made you think it isn't? ni_htparams is per-node(ni)?

If you kept the original mail it might be easier to figure out what you are 
refering to. :) If you ment the stuff I wrote about IBSS, well, as I said, 
IBSS is way to complex for me right to think about..

-- 
Bernhard