From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Oct 27 17:10: 6 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5845F37B4C5 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 17:10:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id RAA68969; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 17:10:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 17:10:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200010280010.RAA68969@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Sergey Babkin Subject: Re: ports/22328: new port -- print/ttf2pt1 Reply-To: Sergey Babkin Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/22328; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Sergey Babkin To: mi@aldan.algebra.com Cc: Mike Meyer , OKAZAKI Tetsurou , FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, Mikhail Teterin Subject: Re: ports/22328: new port -- print/ttf2pt1 Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 20:01:40 -0400 mi@aldan.algebra.com wrote: > > It is easy for me to just not install the "older" ttf2pt1's t1asm, but > they appear to have diverged substantially from the common root since > 1992. I wonder, what the software author's (babkin@bellatlantic.net) > can tell us :) A few more notices: I believe that separating the README files into a separate "doc" hierarchy is a not quite a good idea. I think that only the top-level docs should be moved into a separate hierarchy, the rest of README should be at least linked into both places. Stuff in other/ does not need FreeType, some programs in there need T1Lib (but on the other hand they don't have to be compiled, they are more development tools than something of general interest). I would also add X11 into categories. -SB To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message