From owner-freebsd-questions  Thu Nov 18  3:26:31 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from spike.fa.gau.hu (spike.fa.gau.hu [192.188.243.132])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C8E715394
	for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 18 Nov 1999 03:26:21 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from zgabor@spike.fa.gau.hu)
Received: (from zgabor@localhost)
	by spike.fa.gau.hu (8.9.3/8.9.2) id MAA29328;
	Thu, 18 Nov 1999 12:09:32 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from zgabor)
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 12:09:32 +0100 (CET)
From: Gabor Zahemszky <zgabor@spike.fa.gau.hu>
Message-Id: <199911181109.MAA29328@spike.fa.gau.hu>
To: sheldonh@uunet.co.za, zgabor@spike.fa.gau.hu
Subject: Re: Shell
Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, naddy@mips.rhein-neckar.de
In-Reply-To: <17696.942919296@axl.noc.iafrica.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> > In this thread, somebody said: there isn't ksh93 under FreeBSD.               
> Are you sure?  Are you aware of significant deviations from ksh93 in
> ports/shells/pdksh?

Well.  Search my name in pdksh's ChangeLog, so believe me:
pdksh is a very good ksh88 clone, and the ksh93 is another shell, with
so many new features.
By, Gabor

ZGabor at CoDe dot HU


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message