Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 00:08:08 +0900 From: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@freebsd.org> To: JoaoBR <joao@matik.com.br> Cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/93422: Re: ipfw divert rule Message-ID: <yge3bieyso7.wl%ume@mahoroba.org> In-Reply-To: <200602200845.40948.joao@matik.com.br> References: <200602200300.k1K30TZr050863@freefall.freebsd.org> <200602200845.40948.joao@matik.com.br>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, >>>>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 08:45:40 -0300 >>>>> JoaoBR <joao@matik.com.br> said: joao> I am not sure if I understand what you mean but the patch you pointed out is joao> not for releng_6 and the date is quiet old joao> but it is not clear for me what ip6/ip4 tunneling has to do with diverting It was MFC'ed into RELENG_6: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sbin/ipfw/ipfw2.c.diff?r1=1.76.2.1&r2=1.76.2.2 The change is in meaning of `proto'. So, it is not only for `divert'. Please refer the commit log of above change. Please note that kern/89472 was also regression. -- Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan ume@mahoroba.org ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org http://www.imasy.org/~ume/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?yge3bieyso7.wl%ume>