From owner-freebsd-ports  Sat Jun  3  1:25:42 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from granger.mail.mindspring.net (granger.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.148])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E95B37B62E
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sat,  3 Jun 2000 01:25:40 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from asami@cs.berkeley.edu)
Received: from silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (sji-ca41-211.ix.netcom.com [209.111.208.211])
	by granger.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA21862;
	Sat, 3 Jun 2000 04:25:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.9.3/8.6.9) id BAA75834; Sat, 3 Jun 2000 01:25:00 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2000 01:25:00 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200006030825.BAA75834@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
X-Authentication-Warning: silvia.hip.berkeley.edu: asami set sender to asami@cs.berkeley.edu using -f
To: ports@freebsd.org
Cc: mega@minz.org
Subject: ranlib
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Hi,

ja-slang is not able to delete libslang.a due to ranlib run to it in
@exec.  See the "pkg_delete" error message in

  http://bento.FreeBSD.org/errorlogs/errorlogs/a.4.20000602/ja-slrn-0.9.6.2.log

I was under the impression that ranlib is not needed for static libs
in FreeBSD anymore.  Is this correct?  (So can I take the @exec ranlib
line out of japanese/libslang/pkg/PLIST?)

Satoshi


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message