From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Dec 8 14:31:36 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id OAA27474 for ports-outgoing; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 14:31:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from mexico.brainstorm.eu.org (root@mexico.brainstorm.fr [193.56.58.253]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id OAA27459 for ; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 14:31:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from brasil.brainstorm.eu.org (brasil.brainstorm.fr [193.56.58.33]) by mexico.brainstorm.eu.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA09894 for ; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 23:31:23 +0100 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by brasil.brainstorm.eu.org (8.6.12/8.6.12) with UUCP id XAA17486 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 23:31:20 +0100 Received: (from roberto@localhost) by keltia.freenix.fr (8.8.4/keltia-uucp-2.9) id XAA06512; Sun, 8 Dec 1996 23:14:05 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 8 Dec 1996 23:14:04 +0100 From: roberto@keltia.freenix.fr (Ollivier Robert) To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Somone working on a inn-1.5 port ? References: <199612081725.SAA17856@klemm.gtn.com> X-Mailer: Mutt 0.53 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT ctm#2768 In-Reply-To: ; from Torsten Blum on Dec 8, 1996 21:30:47 +0100 Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk According to Torsten Blum: > I fully agree, but the question is: should we really upgrade the inn port > before 2.2-RELEASE is out ? > inn 1.5 is pretty new. It may have new bugs and so on. Even old bugs. See the two patches at ftp.vix.com. James will issue 1.5.1 very soon. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 3.0-CURRENT #31: Tue Dec 3 23:52:58 CET 1996