From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Apr 28 18:33:32 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id SAA13500
          for current-outgoing; Mon, 28 Apr 1997 18:33:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.50])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id SAA13491
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 28 Apr 1997 18:33:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id SAA03440; Mon, 28 Apr 1997 18:32:19 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Message-Id: <199704290132.SAA03440@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Subject: Re: Longer user names: take 2
To: asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 1997 18:32:19 -0700 (MST)
Cc: terry@lambert.org, current@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199704282338.QAA20319@vader.cs.berkeley.edu> from "Satoshi Asami" at Apr 28, 97 04:38:23 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>  * Isn't there any way that the "USER" field specifically could determine
>  * the largest user name it was going to have to display, and size it
>  * that way?
> 
> I think that's a good idea.  Please send a patch to ps.  (Any others
> you noticed?  I don't run -current around here.)

Patches posted.

'w'.  But if I go in there, I'm not coming out until it takes a '-d'
option like it's supposed to.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.