From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 30 11:59:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8E632E4 for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:59:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakub_lach@mailplus.pl) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90FCE8FC12 for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:59:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TTATS-0002Xh-Lg for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 04:59:14 -0700 Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 04:59:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1351598354663-5756476.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: Threaded 6.4 code compiled under 9.0 uses a lot more memory?.. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:59:16 -0000 If this is only difference between gcc34 v gcc42 it's quite spectacular... -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Threaded-6-4-code-compiled-under-9-0-uses-a-lot-more-memory-tp5756466p5756476.html Sent from the freebsd-hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.