From owner-freebsd-ports  Tue Apr 18 12:59:07 1995
Return-Path: ports-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id MAA16127
          for ports-outgoing; Tue, 18 Apr 1995 12:59:07 -0700
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id MAA16120
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 18 Apr 1995 12:59:03 -0700
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.9/8.6.9) id MAA04711; Tue, 18 Apr 1995 12:58:13 -0700
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 1995 12:58:13 -0700
Message-Id: <199504181958.MAA04711@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: swallace@ece.uci.edu
CC: ports@FreeBSD.org
In-reply-to: <199504181853.AA07367@balboa.eng.uci.edu> (message from Steven Wallace on Tue, 18 Apr 1995 11:52:57 -0700)
Subject: Re: New packages available!
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=)
Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * Why do you say the new ports will NOT run on 2.0R systems?
 * 
 * I find most of them work fine, all you will get is:
 * ld.so: warning: libc.so.2.0: minor version >= 1 expected, using it anyway

Oh, ok.  I didn't actually try it on a 2.0R machine.

I guess it will work as long as you don't run into the incompatible
functions.

Satoshi

 * P.S.  Good job on all your hard work with the ports, Satoshi.

You're welcome!  But I haven't done anything except forward error
messages to the maintainers.... :)