From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 26 12:23:47 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10EE21065671; Mon, 26 May 2008 12:23:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zec@icir.org) Received: from xaqua.tel.fer.hr (xaqua.tel.fer.hr [161.53.19.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEDDF8FC15; Mon, 26 May 2008 12:23:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zec@icir.org) Received: by xaqua.tel.fer.hr (Postfix, from userid 20006) id 7F6D49B652; Mon, 26 May 2008 14:23:45 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on xaqua.tel.fer.hr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.7 Received: from [192.168.200.100] (zec2.tel.fer.hr [161.53.19.79]) by xaqua.tel.fer.hr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4A5E9B646; Mon, 26 May 2008 14:23:44 +0200 (CEST) From: Marko Zec To: Kris Kennaway Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 14:23:27 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <483834AD.9050208@FreeBSD.org> <200805261304.20497.zec@icir.org> <483AA979.5060504@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <483AA979.5060504@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200805261423.27766.zec@icir.org> Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , Julian Elischer , freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vimage kernel broken X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 12:23:47 -0000 On Monday 26 May 2008 14:13:45 Kris Kennaway wrote: ... > Maybe I am using the wrong branch, can you confirm which is current? //depot/user/zec/vimage_7/... tracks RELENG_7 //depot/projects/vimage/... tracks HEAD I couldn't reproduce this panic on neither of the above branches, at least not by solely enabling IPv6 and rpc.lockd. Marko