Date: 22 Jul 2003 21:25:38 +0800 From: Khairil Yusof <kaeru@pd.jaring.my> To: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net> Cc: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 5.1-CURRENT: libkse / libthr and SCHED_4BSD / SCHED_ULE Message-ID: <1058880337.721.28.camel@daemon.home.net> In-Reply-To: <20030722113017.GF863@starjuice.net> References: <20030722113017.GF863@starjuice.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-6GXWgBjCyUYmCM/xLfms Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 19:30, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > 1) libkse or libthr as a replacement for libc_r, and/or Been libmap to universally map libc_r to libkse for about 3 weeks now. Things have been relatively stable since sometime last week. I have no problems so far with using netbeans, tomcat with libkse. I haven't done much stress testing, but Tomcat should have benefits on SMP as the extra threads are running on both my CPUs now instead of one.=20 Netbeans.. seems to be only using one thread for the ide.=20 > 2) SCHED_ULE as a replacement for SCHED_4BSD? On SMP.. SCHED_ULE performance is really bad for me. -- "Optimized, readable, on time; Pick any two."=20 FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT i386=20 9:21PM up 21:19, 2 users, load averages: 0.48, 0.32, 0.22 --=-6GXWgBjCyUYmCM/xLfms Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA/HTtRDAqnLW/+/X8RAviIAKDc1ta5ralD1FJtx3wtswE8PY6MvgCeMxMT SAPBPTeHW0Fm1PXo+voZ71w= =+oD8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-6GXWgBjCyUYmCM/xLfms--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1058880337.721.28.camel>