From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jun 21 16:48:11 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83C151065670
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 21 Jun 2012 16:48:11 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2C208FC0C
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 21 Jun 2012 16:48:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5LGm48V004145;
	Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:48:05 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id
	q5LGm4s9004142; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:48:04 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:48:04 +0200 (CEST)
From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To: Daniel Staal <DStaal@usa.net>
In-Reply-To: <88136b1c2b7ffcd86d9ff4180a39cabf@mail.magehandbook.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211847420.3796@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References: <4FE2CE38.9000100@gmail.com>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211350250.2263@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<4FE30FBC.1070904@gmail.com>
	<88136b1c2b7ffcd86d9ff4180a39cabf@mail.magehandbook.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7
	(wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]);
	Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:48:05 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Is ZFS production ready?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 16:48:11 -0000

> his interactions on several topics.
>
> ZFS is stable and tested, and works well if you have the resources.  That 
> means RAM as well as hard disks - and if you don't have the resources, most 
> of ZFS's advantages wouldn't be coming into play anyway. I have seen no

right. repeat it more times, as your clients may read it :)