Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:48:04 +0200 (CEST)
From:      Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To:        Daniel Staal <DStaal@usa.net>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Is ZFS production ready?
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211847420.3796@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
In-Reply-To: <88136b1c2b7ffcd86d9ff4180a39cabf@mail.magehandbook.com>
References:  <4FE2CE38.9000100@gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211350250.2263@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <4FE30FBC.1070904@gmail.com> <88136b1c2b7ffcd86d9ff4180a39cabf@mail.magehandbook.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> his interactions on several topics.
>
> ZFS is stable and tested, and works well if you have the resources.  That 
> means RAM as well as hard disks - and if you don't have the resources, most 
> of ZFS's advantages wouldn't be coming into play anyway. I have seen no

right. repeat it more times, as your clients may read it :)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211847420.3796>