Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 10:19:04 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 251560] New port: x11-fonts/urw-core35-fonts URW core35 fonts in various formats Message-ID: <bug-251560-7788-SYkRWgMPRq@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-251560-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-251560-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D251560 --- Comment #2 from m.ne@gmx.net --- (In reply to Fernando Apestegu=C3=ADa from comment #1) Hello, Thank you for your comments. At least for now lilypond still requires the TeX Gyre fonts (from ghostscri= pt) and uses those as preferred fallback. Only if those aren't present (which c= an't really happen if the package is installed properly) the system defaults for= the serif/sans serif/monospace families are used. My concern is mainly that as general usage moves to newer lilypond versions, the results should match ac= ross os boundaries. Concerning the different font formats, the installed package adds up o ~17M= B. This includes all typefaces, not just those lilypond uses. To me this doesn= 't look unreasonably huge, so unless someone else chimes in with some other arguments I'll keep the proposed port as is. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-251560-7788-SYkRWgMPRq>