Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 13:29:32 +0100 From: Michelle Sullivan <michelle@sorbs.net> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@FreeBSD.org>, ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option Message-ID: <54B3BE2C.6030207@sorbs.net> In-Reply-To: <20150112122652.GA9472@lonesome.com> References: <mailman.1.1420977600.74846.freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> <20150111235449.A14AEF52@hub.freebsd.org> <20150112040129.GA16097@lonesome.com> <CAG=rPVcTsT2izsmdGMJtD6RgRJ3CwfZg1vN6nC%2BvRMYEQ8iPhA@mail.gmail.com> <20150112122652.GA9472@lonesome.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mark Linimon wrote: > On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 10:38:50PM -0800, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > >> Wrong. I've worked at 3 companies over the years that make direct use of >> the ports tree when creating an embedded product based on FreeBSD. >> > > OK, then this is the first I've heard of it. My mistake. > Just a thought: "FreeNAS" .. I know it uses ports, would one consider any (home NAS) device that ships with FreeNAS as it's OS as an embedded device? (Don't know if there are any, but it was the first thing that came to mind.) -- Michelle Sullivan http://www.mhix.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?54B3BE2C.6030207>