From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Sep 12 14:13:11 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D69437B403 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 14:13:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost) by fledge.watson.org (8.11.6/8.11.5) with SMTP id f8CLCwl77039 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 17:12:58 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) X-Authentication-Warning: fledge.watson.org: doug owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 17:12:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Doug Denault X-Sender: doug@fledge.watson.org To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why, this is new (and BAD, BAD, BAD!!) ... In-Reply-To: <20010911032530.A6785@xor.obsecurity.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG These things take a life of their own (this in response to the most recent post). For me it has, I think, finally answered why my BSDI server `happily' accepts what is (for me and the user base) spam while the FreeBSD servers accept a much lower volume. Which FAQ please? Or if you are so inclined, a hint on editing the .cf file. Thanks On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 11:05:08AM +0100, setantae wrote: > > > The IP that I come out of (194.168.3.4) has both forward and reverse > > DNS set up, which up until this morning was sufficient. > > Please see the FAQ..it's been like that for a long time on the FreeBSD > end. FreeBSD bounces about a spam per second because of this little > configuration trick. > > Kris > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message