From owner-freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org  Wed Feb 21 18:39:56 2018
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 770F4F1D870
 for <freebsd-emulation@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Wed, 21 Feb 2018 18:39:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 175526B25E
 for <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 18:39:56 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix)
 id CA2EFF1D86F; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 18:39:55 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: emulation@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B77BDF1D86E
 for <emulation@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 18:39:55 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Received: from smarthost2.sentex.ca (smarthost2.sentex.ca
 [IPv6:2607:f3e0:80:80::2])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "smarthost.sentex.ca", Issuer "smarthost.sentex.ca" (not verified))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61A726B25D
 for <emulation@freebsd.org>; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 18:39:55 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Received: from lava.sentex.ca (lava.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:5::11])
 by smarthost2.sentex.ca (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w1LIdsBr032088
 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
 for <emulation@freebsd.org>; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 13:39:54 -0500 (EST)
 (envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Received: from [192.168.43.26] (saphire3.sentex.ca [192.168.43.26])
 by lava.sentex.ca (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w1LIdqMK093071
 for <emulation@freebsd.org>; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 13:39:52 -0500 (EST)
 (envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
To: "freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org" <emulation@freebsd.org>
From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
Subject: vtnet vs em in virtualbox
Organization: Sentex Communications
Message-ID: <f7b5a5c3-125f-497c-6f34-9e548872219b@sentex.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 13:39:52 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78
X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems
 <freebsd-emulation.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-emulation>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 18:39:56 -0000

Hi all,
	I noticed recently in RELENG_11 some not so good performance on VMs
using the vtnet driver.  For example on a bridged interface to an epair
nic on the hypervisor, em gets 1.2Gb vs not much more than 250Mb on the
vtnet driver.  Any ideas what might be going on ?

	---Mike
-- 
-------------------
Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 x203
Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net
Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net
Cambridge, Ontario Canada