From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 5 18:08:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B923699; Wed, 5 Jun 2013 18:08:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dt71@gmx.com) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA33518BA; Wed, 5 Jun 2013 18:08:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.80] ([145.236.66.114]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LaWlT-1TyG4d21Nf-00mJj4; Wed, 05 Jun 2013 20:08:00 +0200 Message-ID: <51AF7E72.8010108@gmx.com> Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 20:07:46 +0200 From: dt71@gmx.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/20.0 SeaMonkey/2.17.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Baldwin , freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "injunction" on the use of GA References: <51AF2DE4.3090103@gmx.com> <201306051034.20000.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201306051034.20000.jhb@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:lV4+eMidK2ojlYMYig1EZoDj5l3EcNNDk5YsqxeIaEJoT/U7bmD 47aZ1csGLBMeeBXkKC0wgwfCvKCZkuN4KgdQOBLEHXYFBhKtGP8TYJcLuiTZszRWYT6LWvc FpeZtGkIiZRZe0oTDnA3jG13QhzRTNxMdODZEMJNACWTeilDHV7nGv0QfVtlUAWv/ujI71G xaYBJ/FYkFuqIH6HHrfvw== Cc: webmaster@freebsd.org, freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 18:08:02 -0000 On 06/05/2013 16:34, John Baldwin wrote: > There was quite a lively discussion of this > before it was enabled and a summary of the reasons for using it was posted to > announce@ quite a while ago: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-announce/2012-December/001441.html 1. I was unable to find any traces of such a discussion. Apparently, if there was a discussion, it was held between a small, closed group. 2. After the announcement, arguments were given by the community, that (a) the reasons in the announcement do not warrant the use of GA, and (b) there are good reasons why we should not use GA. These arguments were simply ignored. People only annoy me when they point me to previous discussions -- ones that I have participated in -- or to the announcement. Again, the announcement is not a reply to the community's arguments against GA. The opposite is true.